[illumos-Advocates] RTI https://www.illumos.org/issues/696
Garrett D'Amore
garrett at nexenta.com
Sat May 7 12:50:10 PDT 2011
I didn't read it that way. Rather, my read is that he did not want to be the only reviewer. Yes, it would be good to have some one else here who has hacked in that area of the code. To my knowledge, I may be the closest we have that is not still at Oracle and therefore unable to participate.
-- Garrett
Sent from my iPad
On May 7, 2011, at 12:23 PM, "Richard Lowe" <richlowe at richlowe.net> wrote:
> Sounded to me like Dan wanted more time. So I'm giving it to him (I'm
> not sure where we'd find rootnex experience, off the top of my head
> though)
>
> -- Rich
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 02:23, Garrett D'Amore <garrett at nexenta.com> wrote:
>> Forgot to send the list of reviewers:
>>
>> Reviewed by: Dan McDonald <danmcd at nexenta.com>
>> Reviewed by: Gordon Ross <gwr at nexenta.com>
>> Reviewed by: Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net>
>> Reviewed by: Albert Lee <trisk at nexenta.com>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> - Garrett
>>
>> On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 23:16 -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>>> webrev here: http://mexico.purplecow.org/gdamore/webrev/sgllen/
>>>
>>> garrett at thinkpad{25}> hg outgoing -v
>>> running ssh anonhg at hg.illumos.org "hg -R illumos-gate serve --stdio"
>>> remote: Not trusting file /export/illumos/hgrepos/illumos-gate/.hg/hgrc
>>> from untrusted user hg, group hg
>>> comparing with ssh://anonhg@hg.illumos.org/illumos-gate
>>> searching for changes
>>>
>>> changeset: 13364:3a98c348a826
>>> tag: tip
>>> user: Garrett D'Amore <garrett at nexenta.com>
>>> date: Fri May 06 21:42:56 2011 -0700
>>>
>>> description:
>>> 696 Incorrect check dma_attr_sgllen <= 0 in rootnex_valid_alloc_parms
>>>
>>> modified:
>>> usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/rootnex.c
>>>
>>>
>>> hg pbchk:
>>> garrett at thinkpad{26}> hg pbchk
>>> remote: Not trusting file /export/illumos/hgrepos/illumos-gate/.hg/hgrc
>>> from untrusted user hg, group hg
>>> remote: Not trusting file /export/illumos/hgrepos/illumos-gate/.hg/hgrc
>>> from untrusted user hg, group hg
>>> Copyright check:
>>>
>>> C style check:
>>>
>>> Header format check:
>>>
>>> Java style check:
>>>
>>> Mapfile comment check:
>>>
>>> File permission check:
>>>
>>> Keywords check:
>>>
>>> Comments check:
>>>
>>> Checking for new tags:
>>>
>>> Checking for multiple heads (or branches):
>>>
>>> Checking for branch changes:
>>>
>>> Checking for uncommitted changes:
>>>
>>> Checking for merges:
>>>
>>> No full nightly, but an incremental came back clean (log attached, note
>>> the proto warnings were from closed bits because I naively used cp -r
>>> instead of untarring the closed tarball). I've also supplemented that
>>> with dmake lint in usr/src/uts (after bldenv -d) to make sure that I
>>> didn't introduce any lint errors. It came back clean.
>>>
>>> Testing: To test this, I loaded these bits on a debug system (Thinkpad
>>> W510), using the debug kernel, verified that the debug checks were
>>> present, then also tested with a modified e1000g with the following
>>> change (which I'm *not* committing, this was just for test):
>>>
>>> diff -r ef9e6008c21c usr/src/uts/common/io/e1000g/e1000g_alloc.c
>>> --- a/usr/src/uts/common/io/e1000g/e1000g_alloc.c Fri May 06
>>> 10:04:21 2011 -0700
>>> +++ b/usr/src/uts/common/io/e1000g/e1000g_alloc.c Fri May 06
>>> 23:12:17 2011 -0700
>>> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
>>> 1, /* minimum transfer */
>>> 0xffffffffU, /* maximum transfer */
>>> 0xffffffffffffffffULL, /* maximum segment length */
>>> - MAX_COOKIES, /* maximum number of segments */
>>> + -1, /* maximum number of segments */
>>> 1, /* granularity */
>>> DDI_DMA_FLAGERR, /* dma_attr_flags */
>>> };
>>>
>>> The code seems to work well, and no issues have been noticed.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Advocates mailing list
>> Advocates at lists.illumos.org
>> http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/advocates
>>
More information about the Advocates
mailing list