[illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] 1030 strftime "%x" should generate something strptime can parse

[Garrett D'Amore]

Looks good to me as well.  The order of the copyright notices does not matter.

  -- Garrett D'Amore

On Jul 11, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Igor Kozhukhov <ikozhukhov at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Gordon,
> 
> I have looked - it is OK.
> 
> One question: why Nexenta Copyright before original (on top)?
> 
> I thought that we need put Nexenta Copyright after original.
> 
> Best regards,
> IgorK
> 
>> From: Gordon Ross <gordon.w.ross at gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:37:13 -0400
>> To: "developer at lists.illumos.org" <developer at lists.illumos.org>
>> Subject: Re: [illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] 1030 strftime "%x" should generate
>> something strptime can parse
>> 
>> Anyone else want to look at this little fix before I RTI?
>> 
>>  http://www.yalms.org/cr/illumos-1030/
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Gordon
>> 
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Gordon Ross <gordon.w.ross at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Here's a fix for: https://www.illumos.org/issues/1030
>>> 1030 strftime "%x" should generate something strptime can parse
>>> (This bugs me in the first ten days of every month:)
>>> 
>>> This just fixes the parsing for "%e" and does not modify
>>> any of the localedef files.  (I'll make that a new issue.)
>>> 
>>> This is quite small, so I'm just attaching a patch.
>>> Please review.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gordon
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Developer mailing list
>> Developer at lists.illumos.org
>> http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/developer
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Developer mailing list
> Developer at lists.illumos.org
> http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/developer