[illumos-Developer] webrev for 1108

[Dan Kruchinin]

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> wrote:
> I would expect the XXX comments regarding EBUSY to be resolved in one
> direction or another (either set the error, or remove the comment,
> whichever is correct).

I'm not sure that an answer on the question what error code should be
set if endpoint is closing can be found fast.
There definitely must be the code reporting an error, but we need to
choose the error code STREAMS familiar with. (i.e. it should
know how to deal with it).

Probably it's better to remove the comment and open new issue
describing the problem in both ser
functions after the code is committed.
By the way, we discussed this code with Dan McDonald in IRC,
he suggested to add comment only to the new code. Is it ok?

>
> -- Rich
>



-- 
W.B.R.
Dan Kruchinin