[illumos-Discuss] SPARC

[Matt Lewandowsky]

I agree. However, I think that getting it all buildable by something that 
resembles a mere mortal who is starting on 134, at all, is paramount.

--Matt

-- 
Matt Lewandowsky
Big Geek
Greenviolet
matt at greenviolet.net   http://www.greenviolet.net
+1 415 578 5782  (US)  +44 844 484 8254 (UK)
+86 755 33944325 (CN)  +39 02 8715 7053 (IT)

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Joerg Schilling" <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Thursday, 19 August, 2010 2:00
To: <matt at greenviolet.net>; <garrett at damore.org>; <f.middleton at apogeect.com>
Cc: <discuss at lists.illumos.org>
Subject: Re: [illumos-Discuss] SPARC

> "Matt Lewandowsky" <matt at greenviolet.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm not advocating anything like what you're talking about. Right now,
>> Illumos needs to be a useful set of code. The quickest way to get there 
>> is
>> to ensure that you have at least one fully-functional platform, then 
>> bring
>> the other(s) back to parity.
>
> Maybe you missunderstand me: I vote to avoid adding incorrect code as 
> early as
> possible. Sparec related problems could be avoided _iff_ someone runs
> compilations on Sparc. If such a compilation unveils problems, they should 
> be
> fixed ad soon as possible.
>
> Jörg
>
> -- 
> EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 
> Berlin
>       js at cs.tu-berlin.de                (uni)
>       joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
> http://schily.blogspot.com/
> URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
>