[illumos-Discuss] LLVM / clang anyone?

[Blake]

I realize that you are all taking the dev discussion to another list,
but I'd like to say how exciting it is to see renewed interest in this
sort of community dev work!

Blake



On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Garrett D'Amore <garrett at nexenta.com> wrote:
> Hey guys, can I recommend that we take the discussion of compiler
> issues, and other "developer" style technical issues to
> developer at lists.illumos.org?
>
> I like the conversation, but I think it makes sense to keep in the right
> list.
>
>        -Garrett
>
> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 14:49 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote:
>>
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > On 19/08/10 13:26, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> > > An hour and 1.8 GB later, I just verified that it does not work on Solaris x86.
>> > > There are hundreds of linker errors related to missing functions.
>> >
>> > """
>> > [root at babylon5 /]# clang --version
>> > clang version 1.1 (branches/release_27)
>> > Target: i386-pc-solaris2.10
>> > Thread model: posix
>> >
>> > [root at babylon5 /]# uname -a
>> > SunOS babylon5 5.10 Generic_142901-12 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
>> > """
>> >
>> > My compilation notes don't show anything special. But I am compiling 32
>> > bits only.
>>
>> How did you compile this?
>>
>> I just followed the instructions from clang and failed.
>>
>> Did you install to /opt/clang? Would you be willing to share your binaries in
>> case compilation is not repeatable?
>>
>> Jörg
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.illumos.org
> http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/discuss
>