[illumos-Developer] LLVM / clang anyone?

[Piotr Jasiukajtis]

Hi,

What about path64 suite?  It's easy to build and install on
OpenSolaris based system:


cmake-2.8.2
$ ./configure --prefix=${HOME}/cmake/
$ gmake
$ gmake install


git clone git://github.com/path64/compiler.git

$ export PATH=/export/home/estibi/cmake/bin:${PATH}

src$ cmake -DPATH64_ENABLE_HUGEPAGES=OFF -DPATH64_ENABLE_MATHLIBS=OFF
-DPATH64_ENABLE_OPENMP=OFF -DPATH64_ENABLE_PSCRUNTIME=OFF
-DPSC_CRT_PATH=/usr/lib/amd64 -DPATH64_ENABLE_PROFILING=OFF
-DPATH64_ENABLE_TARGETS=x8664 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
-DPATH64_ENABLE_FORTRAN=OFF
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/code/pathscale/compiler_obj/ ..

gmake -j2

gmake -j2 install



On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Antonio Vieiro
<antonio at antonioshome.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So here we come to the developer list from the discuss list.
>
> We were talking about the LLVM/clang compiler, that promises faster compile
> times [1], that has been recently awarded with the SIGPLAN Software Systems
> award [2], and that is able to compile the FreeBSD kernel [3] (but not all
> BSD ports yet).
>
> It seems LLVM 2.8 does not support Sparc 64 (but does support Sparc 32), do
> that is a problem.
>
> Garrett wisely said in the discuss list that
>
>> I'm very supportive any effort to support new compilers.  However, we
>> will not be adding new "shadow" compilers, and we will need to retain
>> support for the compilers we already have.  I want to enable choice,
>> without forcing pain and suffering on other people.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Antonio
>
> [1] http://clang.llvm.org/performance.html
> [2] http://blog.llvm.org/2010/06/llvm-receives-first-ever-sigplan.html
> [3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [illumos-Discuss] LLVM / clang anyone?
> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:11:05 -0700
> From: Garrett D'Amore <garrett at nexenta.com>
> Organization: Nexenta Systems
> To: Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> CC: Discuss at lists.illumos.org
>
> Hey guys, can I recommend that we take the discussion of compiler
> issues, and other "developer" style technical issues to
> developer at lists.illumos.org?
>
> I like the conversation, but I think it makes sense to keep in the right
> list.
>
>        -Garrett
>
> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 14:49 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>
>> Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote:
>>
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > On 19/08/10 13:26, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> > > An hour and 1.8 GB later, I just verified that it does not work on
>> > > Solaris x86.
>> > > There are hundreds of linker errors related to missing functions.
>> >
>> > """
>> > [root at babylon5 /]# clang --version
>> > clang version 1.1 (branches/release_27)
>> > Target: i386-pc-solaris2.10
>> > Thread model: posix
>> >
>> > [root at babylon5 /]# uname -a
>> > SunOS babylon5 5.10 Generic_142901-12 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
>> > """
>> >
>> > My compilation notes don't show anything special. But I am compiling 32
>> > bits only.
>>
>> How did you compile this?
>>
>> I just followed the instructions from clang and failed.
>>
>> Did you install to /opt/clang? Would you be willing to share your binaries
>> in
>> case compilation is not repeatable?
>>
>> Jörg
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.illumos.org
> http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Developer mailing list
> Developer at lists.illumos.org
> http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/developer
>



-- 
Piotr Jasiukajtis | estibi | SCA OS0072
http://estseg.blogspot.com