[illumos-Developer] LLVM / clang anyone?

[Joerg Schilling]

"Garrett D'Amore" <garrett at damore.org> wrote:

> So, I'm supportive.  More compiler choices is better.
>
> However, I don't want to create any *dependency* on any more products
> that are closed source.  I'm not sure if path64 fits that description or
> not.

In any case, someone would need to enhance cw and we wnould need to check 
whether we get into problems with the assembler parts.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js at cs.tu-berlin.de                (uni)  
       joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily