[illumos-Developer] LLVM / clang anyone?

[Garrett D'Amore]

On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 22:19 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "Garrett D'Amore" <garrett at damore.org> wrote:
> 
> > So, I'm supportive.  More compiler choices is better.
> >
> > However, I don't want to create any *dependency* on any more products
> > that are closed source.  I'm not sure if path64 fits that description or
> > not.
> 
> In any case, someone would need to enhance cw and we wnould need to check 
> whether we get into problems with the assembler parts.

Right.  So any port to a new compiler would require someone to pick up
that effort.

	- Garrett

> 
> Jörg
>