[illumos-Developer] Trying to IPS star....
Garrett D'Amore
garrett at nexenta.com
Thu Sep 2 08:24:39 PDT 2010
I think you're right on this... and I've posted an updated boilerplate
for review at admin-council and developer-council. (I think my text
slightly different from yours, but it is basically the same idea --
forcing the 1.0 version of the CDDL.)
I'll probably update the prototype* files with the new boilerplate
today.
-- Garrett
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 13:21 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "Garrett D'Amore" <garrett at nexenta.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 21:10 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > set name=info.classification \
> > > value=org.opensolaris.category.2010:System/Libraries
> >
> > This needs to be 2008.
>
> There are two files from ON that use 2010 already and changing thigs
> back to 2008 did not help.
>
> I still get the same unusable error message and need help with creating a
> working manifests/system-library-schily.mf
>
>
>
> > I'd also request that you replace your CDDL header slightly, because the
> > specific text referencing the CDDL may itself be copyrighted.
> >
> > If you look, you can find my text for this in the Makefile for
> > usr/src/cmd/mklocale/Makefile
> >
> > That text I've placed in the public domain (we need to update the
> > prototype files), so it is free to use. We're going to be asking all
> > new files use this banner going forward, so Oracle can't claim copyright
> > infringement for using their boilerplate.
>
> I mentioned already in the IRC that we don't know what CDDL-1.1 could be.
> For this reason we should use a text like:
>
> * The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
> * Common Development and Distribution License, Version 1.0 only.
> * See the file CDDL.Sun.txt in this distribution or
> * http://www.opensolaris.org/license/ for details.
>
> It makes even sense (and it legal) to change back Snorcle files to Version 1.0
> only. In this case, we would need to be able to create a list of contributors
> that has to be asked once a CDDL-1.1 is ready for review in order to decide
> whether to allow the upgrade or not.
>
> BTW: For me as a German author, it is forbidden by law to sign a contract that
> contains claims I cannot know when signing. For this reason, any code I
> contribute is CDDL-1.0 by law anyway.
>
>
> Jörg
>
More information about the Developer
mailing list