[illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] 113, 314, 221 nightly should not call "pkg info" & packaging nits

[Andras Barna]

you mean something like this?
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+sw-porters/ipsclass
probably they are from pkg-gate/src/util/distro-import/classifications.txt

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Garrett D'Amore <garrett at damore.org> wrote:
> Looks good, although I'd like to know where the list of "categories"
> that are acceptable comes from.
>
>        - Garrett
>
> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 12:54 -0400, Richard Lowe wrote:
>> I'd like review of:
>>     113 nightly should not call "pkg info"
>>     214 various packages list invalid classification scheme
>>     221 SVR4 package vendor should be "Illumos"
>>
>> Webrev: http://richlowe.net/webrevs/il-pkg/
>>
>> This just removes the version check of nightly, some people don't like
>> it not being packaging agnostic, but also it's never in my experience
>> proved particularly useful (the failure mode has been the clue that
>> nightly was outdated, not the version stamp).  I'd note that several
>> other woefully outdated version checks in nightly somewhat bare this out
>> (see, for instance, the check of linker version).
>>
>> The packaging changes are somewhat obvious nits, as described in the
>> bug.
>>
>> I've tested nightly with an incremental build (to build the other two
>> fixes), the legacy information via installing osnet-redistributable and
>> checking the VENDOR information in /var/sadm/pkg/*/pkginfo*, and the
>> classifications by running the PM over a BE pointing to my packages, and
>> checking that the problems described don't occur.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -- Rich
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Developer mailing list
> Developer at lists.illumos.org
> http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/developer
>



-- 
http://blog.sartek.net | http://twitter.com/sartek