[illumos-Developer] NIS server
Igor Kozhukhov
ikozhukhov at gmail.com
Thu Jul 7 07:47:45 PDT 2011
I tried configure NIS server.
I have found that package was renamed to service/network/nis:
root at srv249:/var/yp# pkg contents -r -m
pkg://opensolaris.org/SUNWyp@0.5.11,5.11-0.133:20100216T103151Z
set name=pkg.fmri
value=pkg://opensolaris.org/SUNWyp@0.5.11,5.11-0.133:20100216T103151Z
set name=org.opensolaris.consolidation value=osnet
set name=pkg.renamed value=true
set name=variant.opensolaris.zone value=global value=nonglobal
set name=variant.arch value=sparc value=i386
depend fmri=consolidation/osnet/osnet-incorporation type=require
depend fmri=service/network/nis at 0.5.11-0.133 type=require
I don't know why installed service didn't work without workaround?
root at srv249:/var/yp# pkg info service/network/nis
Name: service/network/nis
Summary: NIS Server for Solaris
Description: NIS Server for Solaris 2.6 and up
Category: System/Administration and Configuration
State: Installed
Publisher: openindiana.org
Version: 0.5.11
Build Release: 5.11
Branch: 0.151
Packaging Date: May 23, 2011 03:32:42 PM
Size: 571.34 kB
FMRI:
pkg://openindiana.org/service/network/nis@0.5.11,5.11-0.151:20110523T153242Z
-Igor
> From: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov at gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:44:17 +0400
> To: Igor Kozhukhov <ikozhukhov at gmail.com>
> Cc: "developer at lists.illumos.org" <developer at lists.illumos.org>
> Subject: Re: [illumos-Developer] NIS server
>
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 06:34:55PM +0400, Igor Kozhukhov wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I have found that NIS server not working on OpenIndiana 151 without
>> workaround from site http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=85136
>> ($ pfexec pkg install SUNWyp)
>>
>> Do we have plane for package SUNWyp port to illumos tree?
>
> Just to make sure, are you trying to configure server or client (the
> link you mentioned talks about client)?
>
> If you are trying to configure the client, same link has the following:
>
> `I think the proper fix is to make "ypinit -c" operate correctly if the
> server services aren't present, rather than to add a dependency'
>
> which seems a better solution to me.
>
>
> Yuri
More information about the Developer
mailing list