[illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] sundry fixes to packaging (845, 847, 853, 854, 856, 858, 860)
Garrett D'Amore
garrett at damore.org
Tue Mar 29 14:29:46 PDT 2011
It is weird, but that is the legacy. Longer term we should be able to rely on sh being posix compliant.
Gordon Ross <gordon.w.ross at gmail.com> wrote:
>Most of this looks fine to me. One question:
>
>Why not leave the symlink for /usr/xpg4/bin/sh
>in usr/src/pkg/manifests/system-xopen-xcu4.mf
>with the other links? (and maybe /usr/xpg4/bin)
>
>This bit from issue 853 seems a bit strange:
>"When in a POSIX-y frame of mind, system(3C) will use /usr/xpg4/bin/sh"
>I would expect system(3C) to run /usr/bin/sh
>possibly with options to force "POSIX-y" behavior, if necessary.
>
>thanks,
>Gordon
>
>
>On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> wrote:
>> I'd like review for:
>>
>> 845 xpg4/bin/sh should move back to SUNWcs
>> 847 post* manual pages made obsolete by #111 should be removed
>> 853 system/library is missing references to some license files
>> 854 postscript filter EOF missed some bits
>> 856 SUNWcs should deliver /export and /home
>> 858 text/doctools should have dependencies on things man(1) needs
>> 860 storage/storage-server shouldn't depend on zfs-auto-snapshot
>>
>> webrev:
>>
>> http://richlowe.net/webrevs/il_853/
>>
>> Each bug id is a separate changeset.
>>
>> some notes:
>>
>> 853: These existed _solely_ to provide information in various
>> metadata[1] (initially osol source drops, then packaging), it turns
>> out that a script Garrett added to automatically build that metadata
>> obviates the need for static copies. So I'm reviewing them, rather
>> than referencing them in the package and adding a duplicate copy to
>> the metadata.
>>
>> 854: The removals here include references to postbgi, apparently
>> removed even longer ago, or perhaps never shipped.
>>
>> 860: The package got renamed, normally we'd want to depend on the
>> new name, but the new package is particularly GUI, so it's probably
>> best to drop it
>>
>> -- Rich
>>
>> [1] by CR 6467531 "nightly(1) needs option to generate OpenSolaris delivery"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Developer mailing list
>> Developer at lists.illumos.org
>> http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/developer
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Developer mailing list
>Developer at lists.illumos.org
>http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/developer
More information about the Developer
mailing list