[illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] sundry fixes to packaging (845, 847, 853, 854, 856, 858, 860)
Richard Lowe
richlowe at richlowe.net
Tue Mar 29 14:54:31 PDT 2011
- Previous message: [illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] sundry fixes to packaging (845, 847, 853, 854, 856, 858, 860)
- Next message: [illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] sundry fixes to packaging (845, 847, 853, 854, 856, 858, 860)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 17:37, Gordon Ross <gordon.w.ross at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Garrett D'Amore <garrett at damore.org> wrote:
>> It is weird, but that is the legacy. Longer term we should be able to rely on sh being posix compliant.
>
> In order of preference, here are the solutions I'd favor:
> 1: fix 850 now, making system(3C) run /bin/sh
Ok, I'll do that.
Are you happy with the other bugs?
-- Rich
- Previous message: [illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] sundry fixes to packaging (845, 847, 853, 854, 856, 858, 860)
- Next message: [illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] sundry fixes to packaging (845, 847, 853, 854, 856, 858, 860)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Developer
mailing list