[illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] sundry fixes to packaging (845, 847, 853, 854, 856, 858, 860)
Gordon Ross
gordon.w.ross at gmail.com
Tue Mar 29 13:50:45 PDT 2011
- Previous message: [illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] sundry fixes to packaging (845, 847, 853, 854, 856, 858, 860)
- Next message: [illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] sundry fixes to packaging (845, 847, 853, 854, 856, 858, 860)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Most of this looks fine to me. One question:
Why not leave the symlink for /usr/xpg4/bin/sh
in usr/src/pkg/manifests/system-xopen-xcu4.mf
with the other links? (and maybe /usr/xpg4/bin)
This bit from issue 853 seems a bit strange:
"When in a POSIX-y frame of mind, system(3C) will use /usr/xpg4/bin/sh"
I would expect system(3C) to run /usr/bin/sh
possibly with options to force "POSIX-y" behavior, if necessary.
thanks,
Gordon
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> wrote:
> I'd like review for:
>
> 845 xpg4/bin/sh should move back to SUNWcs
> 847 post* manual pages made obsolete by #111 should be removed
> 853 system/library is missing references to some license files
> 854 postscript filter EOF missed some bits
> 856 SUNWcs should deliver /export and /home
> 858 text/doctools should have dependencies on things man(1) needs
> 860 storage/storage-server shouldn't depend on zfs-auto-snapshot
>
> webrev:
>
> http://richlowe.net/webrevs/il_853/
>
> Each bug id is a separate changeset.
>
> some notes:
>
> 853: These existed _solely_ to provide information in various
> metadata[1] (initially osol source drops, then packaging), it turns
> out that a script Garrett added to automatically build that metadata
> obviates the need for static copies. So I'm reviewing them, rather
> than referencing them in the package and adding a duplicate copy to
> the metadata.
>
> 854: The removals here include references to postbgi, apparently
> removed even longer ago, or perhaps never shipped.
>
> 860: The package got renamed, normally we'd want to depend on the
> new name, but the new package is particularly GUI, so it's probably
> best to drop it
>
> -- Rich
>
> [1] by CR 6467531 "nightly(1) needs option to generate OpenSolaris delivery"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Developer mailing list
> Developer at lists.illumos.org
> http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/developer
>
- Previous message: [illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] sundry fixes to packaging (845, 847, 853, 854, 856, 858, 860)
- Next message: [illumos-Developer] [REVIEW] sundry fixes to packaging (845, 847, 853, 854, 856, 858, 860)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Developer
mailing list